The graphical abstract competition provides the platform for scholars who are in early or mid stage of their research to present their work in front of the panel of expertise. This cultivates scholars’ academic, presentation, and research communication skills.
MS/Ph.D scholars upto 3rd year.
Postgraduates final year (Masters and Dual degrees).
Graphical abstract shall be a single image like a poster containing main information of the research work.
3min recorded video of the presentation shall be submitted. The presentation should contain the graphical abstract and the video of the participant in the corner.
Presentations are limited to 3 minutes and competitors exceeding 3 minutes are disqualified.
Videos must meet the following criteria:
recorded on a plain background;
recorded from a static position;
The presentation must be continuous – no sound edits or breaks.
No additional props (e.g. costumes, musical instruments, laboratory equipment and animated backgrounds) are permitted within the recording.
Presentations are to be spoken word (e.g. no poems, raps or songs).
No additional electronic media (e.g. sound and video files) are permitted within the video recording.
The decision of the adjudicating panel is final.
At every level of the competition each competitor will be assessed on the judging criteria listed below. Each criterion is equally weighted and has an emphasis on the audience.
Comprehension and Content:
Did the presentation provide an understanding of the background and significance to the research question being addressed while explaining terminology and avoiding jargon?
Did the presentation follow a clear and logical sequence.
Was the research topic, research significance, results/impact and outcomes communicated in language appropriate to a non-specialist audience?
Did the presenter spend adequate time on each element of their presentation - or did they elaborate for too long on one aspect or was the presentation rushed?
Engagement and Communication:
Did the oration make the audience want to know more?
Was the presenter careful not to trivialise or generalise their research?
Did the presenter convey enthusiasm for their research?
Did the presenter capture and maintain their audience’s attention?
Did the PowerPoint slide enhance the presentation - was it clear, legible, and concise?
Initial Screening: First, all the submission will be reviewed by the panel of reviewers based on the selection criteria.
Finals: Participants selected from the initial screening will present in front of the panel of judges live online. The decision of the adjudicating panel is final.
March 26, 2021, 11:59 PM
Ishank Jain - 9994634399
Sowmya - 9566542363
Participants can record the presentation using any online conferencing tools such as google meet, zoom etc. The following tutorials may help you with your recording.
Video should be in .mp4 format with adequate quality.
Video file should be named as “ParticipantName_degree_institute”
Upload your video in your google drive and share the link in this form. The file access should be given to rsd mail id - firstname.lastname@example.org
Select an option to know more.